Democratic Party support on the line in heated races for state senate, congress

SD7: Nancy Skinner and Sandre Swanson

The cynics say the reward of vigorously vying to be the choice of the statewide Democratic Party merely amounts for the privilege of placing a graphical badge on their Website and subsequent mailers.

But for the two most anticipated primary races in the East Bay, the party’s exclusive endorsement may be the difference between winning and losing, but also a guide for where influential donors and independent expenditures committees place their bets from here to November.

Going into Saturday’s Alameda County Democratic Party pre-endorsement meeting, uncertainty remains over the local leadership’s choice in the likely intraparty Ninth State Senate race between former Assemblymembers Nancy Skinner and Sandre Swanson and the Rep. Mike Honda-Ro Khanna rematch in the 17th Congressional District.

CA17: Rep. Mike Honda and Ro Khanna

Past loyalties and pressure from surrogates attached to all four campaigns is making it difficult for party delegates to decide their votes come Saturday.

Beginning with the state senate race, the sheer number of early big-name Democratic Party endorsements for Swanson campaign would, in most instances, would translate to his campaign getting the nod. However, the stated support for Swanson coming from popular incumbents like Rep, Barbara Lee, Assemblymember Rob Bonta and current office holder State Sen. Loni Hancock is not translating to early widespread enthusiasm elsewhere.

There are indications Swanson’s forthcoming campaign finance report will match last summer’s rather lackluster mid-year tally. In fact, the long shot candidacy of Piedmont Democrat Katherine Welch may have outraised Swanson during the last six months of last year, according to sources. Such an outcome is giving some Democratic operatives reason to pause whether Swanson can overcome Skinner prohibitive war chest, which opened with more than $925,000. Swanson reported just over $80,000 in cash last July.

But here’s where self-interested Swanson supporters like Bonta and Lee may lean hard on delegates to back the long-time Oakland and Alameda representative. For this group, past political favors may be called in for Swanson. The anxiety will follow for some because there is growing consensus that Skinner, not Swanson is the best candidate.

Meanwhile, in the 17th Congressional District, Khanna has been able in recent weeks to limit Honda’s ability to gain once perfunctory support among Silicon Valley Democratic clubs. For Khanna, even a no-endorsement is a major victory for his campaign. The same scenario exists for Khanna at the pre-endorsement meeting where even blocking Honda’s ability to win the backing will be a major headline. Honda could still cobble together support for the endorsement and the statewide convention next month, but the blow to his campaign might remain through the June primary.

Last week, Khanna said his campaign had succeeded in getting enough support among pre-endorsement voters add the race to Saturday’s agenda. The key for Honda among open-minded pre-endorsement voters may simply come down to how well he articulates his case this Saturday.

Those who witnessed Honda’s speech earlier this month to the Democratic Club of Sunnyvale say it was inspiring, classic Honda. However, other appearances have been uneven, including last week’s forum at the Berryessa-North San Jose Democratic Club where Honda appeared sullen, distracted and often pondered simple questions like “Why are you best candidate?” with long pauses.

Khanna’s inroads with grassroots groups appear to growing and the margin between Honda winning the pre-endorsement and losing is shrinking. Another performance from Honda devoid of passion might be the difference. It may also be moment where Democratic donors shut off the spigot of money flowing towards Honda.

2 thoughts on “Democratic Party support on the line in heated races for state senate, congress

  1. By MW:

    Over the last several years the Clintons have collected hundreds of millions of dollars in lightly disguised bribes, er, excuse me, I mean fees for speeches, from a motley assortment of sleazeballs and scumbags, and including those they pretend to be interested in regulating.

    And every time Hillary tries to feed us some more of her lies and garbage about how she did not consider those outrageously high fees to be nothing more than lightly disguised bribes, more voters realize that the DP is not the true friend and protector of the little people that it pretends to be.

    And eventually as more and more voters realize the actual truth about the big boys of the DP, and such as for instance Feinstein, Pelosi, and the Clintons, and so forth, the endorsement of the big boys in the DP will not be worth even a warm bucket of spit.


  2. By MW:

    While now, and while we are still in early 2016, most members of the DP running for office want the official endorsement of the big boys in the DP. However quite likely by 2018, and almost certainly by 2020 the endorsement of the DP will not be seen as a big plus, and in fact in many cases will be a huge minus.

    More specifically, more and more members of the general public are getting wise to the fact that neither the DP nor big government is their friend, and instead both big government and the big boys in the DP are big sleazy blood sucking leeches that: one, make much worse virtually everything they touch; and two, are primarily composed of parasites, scam artists, and fifth columnists, and no matter how much they pretend they are on the side of the little people.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s