Swalwell Boasts Campaign Contributions Four Times Larger Than Corbett

State Sen. Ellen Corbett, Rep. Eric Swalwell

CONGRESS//15TH DISTRICT//CAMPAIGN FINANCE | Less than nine months until the June 2014 primary, freshman Rep. Eric Swalwell possesses a campaign war chest four times larger than fellow Democrat State Sen. Ellen Corbett, his likely opponent for the 15th Congressional District.

Swalwell built upon a strong fundraising performance from earlier this year, according to the campaign finance reports released Wednesday, with $279,428 in contributions. Through the current election cycle, Swalwell has raised $807,936. As of Sept. 30, the campaign maintains $614,262 cash-on-hand after $69,598 in expenditures. Swawell has spent $223,520 total for his re-election during this cycle, according to the report.

One-third of the Swalwell’s contributions, however, came from political action committees in the the defense, pharmaceutical, and medical industries. Overall, 40 percent of Swalwell’s contributions have come from special interests groups.

Among the political class, Swalwell received donations this election cycle from campaign committees associated with Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) ($4,000); Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) ($2,000) and Francisco Zermeno for Hayward Mayor ($500).

In addition, former Assemblymember John Dutra, Sr. contributed $2,500 to Swalwell’s campaign; his son, former Fremont Council candidate John Dutra, Jr. ($2,700); former Alameda County Sheriff Tom Orloff ($1,500); former Assemblymember Fiona Ma ($250); former state controller Steve Westly ($2,000) and former Hayward school boardmember Jesus Armas ($500).

Corbett, however, has continued a somewhat languid pace in attracting campaign finance, raising $36,502 during the period ending Sept. 30, according to finance reports. During this election cycle, Corbett has raised $240,512 in campaign contributions. After spending just $9,268 during the past filing period, Corbett reports $143,417 cash-in-hand, according to finance reports.

Much of Corbett’s fundraising draws upon her strong contacts in San Leandro where she was once mayor and the State Senate. Campaign committees for State Sens. Darrell Steinberg and Mark Leno both gave $1,000 during the last reporting period. The re-election committee of Swalwell’s past opponent, Pete Stark, also donated $2,000 toward the defeat of his young rival. Union City Mayor Carol Vernaci contributed $350, according the finance report.

Patrick Kennedy, the founder of innovative San Leandro data processing company, OsiSoft, along with his wife, contributed a total of $10,000 to Corbett’s campaign. Among other notable contributors is San Leandro businessman Anthony Batarse ($2,300); Attorney and current San Leandro Zoning and Adjustments Commissioner Philip Daly ($1,200) and Alameda County labor leader Josie Camacho ($500).

177 thoughts on “Swalwell Boasts Campaign Contributions Four Times Larger Than Corbett

  1. My husband and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year because we think she has done more as our Senator than Swalwell has done as our congressman.

    Like

  2. According to this Oct 16 article a large part of Swalwell's contributions came from the medical and pharmaceutical vested interest groups. These are the same groups that have been sticking it to the middle class and poor for years. My family and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year.

    Like

  3. I agree Ellen Corbett in 2014. She is a much better politician an has done more for Seniors, children,women, the environment, consumers, working families, teachers, nurses, and on and on.. Swalwell has accomplished nothing on the Dublin city council or since he's been in Congress.

    Like

  4. My husband and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year because we think she has done more as our Senator than Swalwell has done as our congressman.

    Like

  5. To the anon 9:28 poster—-Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    Like

  6. Whorbett wants to try and run against Stark again but congressman Swalwell is too smart and popular to let that happen. Eventually it will boil down to Whorbett running on her merits and accomplishments, and congressman Swalwell running on his merits and accomplishments. I think it's fair to say Whorebett has accomplished very little and congressman Swalwell has accomplished much more. Bitch loses in a landslide.

    Like

  7. I like Ellen too but I don't know if she will win by much. I'll take 52-48 and be immensely happy, and I'll bet Corbett will too. I do agree when Swalwell was on the Dublin City Council he did nothing and so far in Congress also has authored no significant legislation, but has signed on to other Dems bills. Ellen Corbett, by contrast, has authored signifiant legislation benefitting the middle class and lower middle class.

    Like

  8. Agree with 9:00 PM, my family and I will never vote for Swalwell again, he's screwed up right and left, as the citizen has pointed out, and he seems to be devoid of any principles. I'm a conservative who lives in Livermore and will vote for anyone else before that two faced attorney. Like it or not, I do know where Corbett stands. Even though I disagree with some of the things she does, I like her as a person and will vote for her if the choice is between the two of them.

    Like

  9. My husband and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year because we think she has done more as our Senator than Swalwell has done as our congressman.

    Like

  10. I actually signed up for Obamacare and it was cheaper for me with a better policy. Even though I agree with this particular vote, I have seen Ellen at more events I go to and will be voting for her next year. I think she has accomplished more for the middle class and poor and I trust her to do more for us than Eric.

    Like

  11. According to this Oct 16 article a large part of Swalwell's contributions came from the medical and pharmaceutical vested interest groups. These are the same groups that have been sticking it to the middle class and poor for years. My family and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year.

    Like

  12. The congressman has been a great representative. I'll definitely be supporting him next year. He'll sail just fine; no credible opposition since competition knows he's doing a fantastic job.

    Like

  13. To the anon 11:29 poster—-Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    Like

  14. Anon 11:29: What the hell are you talking about? Are you off your meds? You make no sense. It seems you are in need of some help.

    Like

  15. I agree Ellen Corbett in 2014. She is a much better politician an has done more for Seniors, children,women, the environment, consumers, working families, teachers, nurses, and on and on.. Swalwell has accomplished nothing on the Dublin city council or since he's been in Congress.

    Like

  16. As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell taken so many different
    positions on so many topics he can't even remember them all.
    Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen. Tavares
    even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He told people
    he was for the chained CPI, then he was against it. He told
    people he was for changes to Social Security, then he was
    against them. Not a good track record on consumer bills after
    he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop, flip-flop.

    Like

  17. Now Dorcas, the poster of the last two posts–one minute a part–is agreeing with herself. What a poor, pathetic, fat ass bitch she is.

    Dorcas, you never voted for the congressman in your entire life. You don't live in the district. You have always volunteered on old man's Stark's campaigns. Finally, you're off your meds again and smoking the bad stuff.

    Eric going to kick that fat ass where it hurts!

    Like

  18. I agree Ellen Corbett in 2014. She is a much better politician an has done more for Seniors, children,women, the environment, consumers, working families, teachers, nurses, and on and on.. Swalwell has accomplished nothing on the Dublin city council or since he's been in Congress.

    Like

  19. According to this Oct 16 article a large part of Swalwell's contributions came from the medical and pharmaceutical vested interest groups. These are the same groups that have been sticking it to the middle class and poor for years. My family and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year.

    Like

  20. Dorcas, you never voted for the congressman in your entire life. You don't live in the district. You have always volunteered on old man's Stark's campaigns. Finally, you're off your meds again and smoking the bad stuff.

    Eric going to kick that fatt ass where it hurts!

    Like

  21. Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  22. Eric is not running against Stark this time with his irascible temperament and personality. Ellen Corbett is a much more formidable foe and an extremely likable and capable politician. She is very likely to win as she has helped many people in this area over the years. I know our family will be supporting her.

    Like

  23. Dorcas, you never voted for the congressman in your entire life. You don't live in the district. You have always volunteered on old man's Stark's campaigns. Finally, you're off your meds again and smoking the bad stuff.

    Eric going to kick that fatt ass where it hurts!

    Like

  24. I agree Ellen Corbett in 2014. She is a much better politician an has done more for Seniors, children,women, the environment, consumers, working families, teachers, nurses, and on and on.. Swalwell has accomplished nothing on the Dublin city council or since he's been in Congress.

    Like

  25. Anon above: What the hell are you talking about? Are you off your meds? You make no sense. It seems you are in need of some help.

    Like

  26. Dorcas, you never voted for the congressman in your entire life. You don't live in the district. You have always volunteered on old man's Stark's campaigns. Finally, you're off your meds again and smoking the bad stuff.

    Eric going to kick that fatt ass where it hurts!

    Like

  27. According to this Oct 16 article a large part of Swalwell's contributions came from the medical and pharmaceutical vested interest groups. These are the same groups that have been sticking it to the middle class and poor for years. My family and I will be voting for Ellen Corbett next year.

    Like

  28. Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  29. The congressman has been a great representative. I'll definitely be supporting him next year. He'll sail just fine; no credible opposition since competition knows he's doing a fantastic job.

    By the way: pharmaceuticals, which help gravely ill seniors, is abbreviated without a capital 'P.' You really need to learn the proper rules of English, including grammar and composition style.

    Still haven't corrected or learned your English!

    Like

  30. If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  31. Swalwell is scared, and has his followers writing arguments against Ellen Corbett that are lies. He and his shills, like the antiunion Hayward troll, are panicking because they have taken internal polls that have Ellen ahead in the congressional race.

    If you check the Citizen articles you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  32. The congressman has been a great representative. I'll definitely be supporting him next year. He'll sail just fine; no credible opposition since competition knows he's doing a fantastic job.

    By the way: pharmaceuticals, which help gravely ill seniors, is abbreviated without a capital 'P.' You really need to learn the proper rules of English, including grammar and composition style.

    Like

  33. Swalwell is scared, and has his followers writing arguments against Ellen Corbett that are lies. He and his shills, like the antiunion Hayward troll, are panicking because they have taken internal polls that have Ellen ahead in the congressional race.

    Now the troll is pretending to be Ellen's ex. This shows how low he will go and how mentally disturbed he is. So sad and desperate. LOL

    If you check the Citizen articles you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  34. My family will be voting for Ellen Corbett because we don't trust Eric to keep his word on anything. As this and other articles point out, he says one thing and does another. Stand for something will you. Mean what you say, and say what you mean Swalwell. What a wishy washy congressman! Also, quit taking money from big Pharma and shafting us little people.

    Like

  35. The congressman has been a great representative. I'll definitely be supporting him next year. He'll sail just fine; no credible opposition since competition knows he's doing a fantastic job.

    Like

  36. The congressman has been a great representative. I'll definitely be supporting him next year. He'll sail just fine; no credible opposition since competition knows he's doing a fantastic job.

    Like

  37. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    p.p.s. I do live in the District, but I bet you wish I didn't.

    Like

  38. Quit trying to change the subject. This article is about Swalwell, your boss, taking huge campaign slush funds from mega corporations like big pharma, etc.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  39. Will always be here to fuck you up, Dorcas–Space HO!

    The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  40. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    p.p.s. I do live in the District, but I bet you wish I didn't.

    Like

  41. Quit trying to change the subject. This article is about Swalwell, your boss, taking huge campaign slush funds from mega corporations like big pharma, etc.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  42. This Adele Kanickerbocker, I'm the mother of Dorcas Wentzel, the one they call Space Ho. I just want to apologize to everyone on behalf of my adopted daughter. She has been nothing but one disappointment after another to her father and me. Thank the good Lord she didn't come from my womb. Hell, I would take two bits to be shed of that miserable bitch. She aint never had a man before. All she does is live in the basement of our Berkeley house and stay glued to that computer. I am 89 years old. She is 67. What a tragedy for a mother to have a messed up bitch like that for an adopted daughter. Hurts me terribly to write all this, but Dorcas is just nothing but useless. I have had to call congressman MR. Swalwells office to apologize for her. They know she needs to go back to Napa but I can't get that poor pathetic old bitch up there without the restraints. Dorcas can't do nothing in that election. She hates on congressman Mr. Swalwell since he's a man and she prefers women, in the bed to. Please forgive this old mother having to clean up the pile of shit that her pathetic old adopted daughter causes. My man and I are hoping that she passes from the earth fast. She is a real abomination. Tears at mothers apron strings to have a fat ass bitch for an adopted daughter.

    Like

  43. Will always be here to fuck you up, Dorcas–Space HO!

    The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  44. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    p.p.s. I do live in the District, but I bet you wish I didn't.

    Like

  45. Quit trying to change the subject. This article is about Swalwell, your boss, taking huge campaign slush funds from mega corporations like big pharma, etc.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  46. This Adele Kanickerbocker, I'm the mother of Dorcas Wentzel, the one they call Space Ho. I just want to apologize to everyone on behalf of my adopted daughter. She has been nothing but one disappointment after another to her father and me. Thank the good Lord she didn't come from my womb. Hell, I would take two bits to be shed of that miserable bitch. She aint never had a man before. All she does is live in the basement of our Berkeley house and stay glued to that computer. I am 89 years old. She is 67. What a tragedy for a mother to have a messed up bitch like that for an adopted daughter. Hurts me terribly to write all this, but Dorcas is just nothing but useless. I have had to call congressman MR. Swalwells office to apologize for her. They know she needs to go back to Napa but I can't get that poor pathetic old bitch up there without the restraints. Dorcas can't do nothing in that election. She hates on congressman Mr. Swalwell since he's a man and she prefers women, in the bed to. Please forgive this old mother having to clean up the pile of shit that her pathetic old adopted daughter causes. My man and I are hoping that she passes from the earth fast. She is a real abomination. Tears at mothers apron strings to have a fat ass bitch for an adopted daughter.

    Like

  47. Will always be here to fuck you up, Dorcas–Space HO!

    The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  48. If you live in the district vote for whoever you want. I'll be voting for Ellen because Swalwell only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and himself. He's about everything that is wrong in politics. He's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting man will be a one term congressman.

    Like

  49. If you check the Citizen's articles you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  50. Quit trying to change the subject. This article is about Swalwell, your boss, taking huge campaign slush funds from mega corporations like big pharma, etc.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  51. The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  52. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  53. If you live in the district vote for whoever you want. I'll be voting for Ellen because Swalwell only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and himself. He's about everything that is wrong in politics. He's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting man will be a one term congressman.

    Like

  54. Because of the tone of the Swalwell supporter (sexist remarks),
    I will be voting for Ellen Corbett if she runs. I voted for Eric
    against Stark but realize that was a mistake. I think we need
    more women in Congress and Ellen is more than qualified.

    Like

  55. Quit trying to change the subject. This article is about Swalwell, your boss, taking huge campaign slush funds from mega corporations like big pharma, etc.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  56. This Adele Kanickerbocker, I'm the mother of Dorcas Wentzel, the one they call Space Ho. I just want to apologize to everyone on behalf of my adopted daughter. She has been nothing but one disappointment after another to her father and me. Thank the good Lord she didn't come from my womb. Hell, I would take two bits to be shed of that miserable bitch. She aint never had a man before. All she does is live in the basement of our Berkeley house and stay glued to that computer. I am 89 years old. She is 67. What a tragedy for a mother to have a messed up bitch like that for an adopted daughter. Hurts me terribly to write all this, but Dorcas is just nothing but useless. I have had to call congressman MR. Swalwells office to apologize for her. They know she needs to go back to Napa but I can't get that poor pathetic old bitch up there without the restraints. Dorcas can't do nothing in that election. She hates on congressman Mr. Swalwell since he's a man and she prefers women, in the bed to. Please forgive this old mother having to clean up the pile of shit that her pathetic old adopted daughter causes. My man and I are hoping that she passes from the earth fast. She is a real abomination. Tears at mothers apron strings to have a fat ass bitch for an adopted daughter.

    Like

  57. The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  58. Anon 4:33—trying to change the subject again? The article is about Swalwell getting bought off by mega corporations like big pharma–try and stick to the topic if you can.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen's articles you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all. Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    p.p.s. I hope he gets the help he needs. Very sad.

    Like

  59. Quit trying to change the subject. This article is about Swalwell, your boss, taking huge campaign slush funds from mega corporations like big pharma, etc.

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  60. If you live in the district vote for whoever you want. I'll be voting for Ellen because Swalwell only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and himself. He's about everything that is wrong in politics. He's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting man will be a one term congressman.

    Like

  61. Because of the tone of the Swalwell supporter (sexist remarks),
    I will be voting for Ellen Corbett if she runs. I voted for Eric
    against Stark but realize that was a mistake. I think we need
    more women in Congress and Ellen is more than qualified.

    Like

  62. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    p.p.s. I do live in the District, but I bet you wish I didn't.

    Like

  63. This Adele Kanickerbocker, I'm the mother of Dorcas Wentzel, the one they call Space Ho. I just want to apologize to everyone on behalf of my adopted daughter. She has been nothing but one disappointment after another to her father and me. Thank the good Lord she didn't come from my womb. Hell, I would take two bits to be shed of that miserable bitch. She aint never had a man before. All she does is live in the basement of our Berkeley house and stay glued to that computer. I am 89 years old. She is 67. What a tragedy for a mother to have a messed up bitch like that for an adopted daughter. Hurts me terribly to write all this, but Dorcas is just nothing but useless. I have had to call congressman MR. Swalwells office to apologize for her. They know she needs to go back to Napa but I can't get that poor pathetic old bitch up there without the restraints. Dorcas can't do nothing in that election. She hates on congressman Mr. Swalwell since he's a man and she prefers women, in the bed to. Please forgive this old mother having to clean up the pile of shit that her pathetic old adopted daughter causes. My man and I are hoping that she passes from the earth fast. She is a real abomination. Tears at mothers apron strings to have a fat ass bitch for an adopted daughter.

    Like

  64. The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  65. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  66. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  67. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  68. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  69. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  70. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  71. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  72. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  73. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  74. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  75. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  76. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  77. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  78. The entire congressional district is inside the BART district.

    As noted in both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Hayward Daily Review (Argus, Tri Valley, etc ) Corbett was part of, if not the most aggressive legislator trying to pressure the BART board members into giving away the store to the BART unions.

    This, after the public had made it clear that they wanted BART to hold firm with the 12% wage offer and to demand more contributions for pensions and especially medical and dental.

    Corbett was part of the Thursday night arm twisting trying to prevent a strike by caving in to the unions.
    The public saw those legislators as selling out the public's interests. Both that of taxpayers and fare paying passengers.

    The, the BART management under pressure, including that from legislators like Corbett, caved in and gave away the store.
    Popping up the wage offer from 12.0% to 15.38% overnight.
    Anger is not a unreasonable word for how most of the public felt.
    Corbett was leading the charge to have BART cave in to the excess demands.
    She can't disown the play she made to get the union vote and campaign money from the BART workers.

    I'm thinking many moderate Democrats West of the hills as well as everyone East of the hills is not going to be pleased with Corbett's working behind their backs to foist higher future fares onto the riders so that BART workers can keep their lofty compensation packages.

    Perhaps Corbett can explain why she was fighting to have BART union members get their entire families covered for full medical, dental and vision for only $129 a month when many of us are paying over $500 a month for one person and that, without any dental at all.

    Gold plated benefits and a excessive pay raise is what Corbett's pressure tactics contribute to.
    Guess who will be paying that bill over the next 5 to 10 years?

    The very same voters who reside in the congressional district that Corbett wants to win.

    Most of us won't forget her pressuring our BART board members to vote against our interests.

    Like

  79. Maybe if some of these “people” came out from behind their anonymous masks, they might be more influencial.

    Like

  80. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  81. Space Ho finally got off the john. We were hoping she fell in and went with the flush. There's always next time.

    Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  82. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  83. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  84. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  85. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  86. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  87. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  88. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  89. If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Like

  90. Like Obam, Biden, and every other politician, he's 'evolved.'

    Get used to it. He will be our congressman for many, many more years. We are lucky to have him. If you don't care for him move away.

    Like

  91. In the 2012 election, Eric Swalwell repeatedly criticized Pete Stark for taking money from PACs and hammered home points about finance reform again and again.
    What a goddamn disgusting liar. He is everything that is wrong with politics.

    Like

  92. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  93. If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Like

  94. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  95. If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    As far as flip-flopping goes Swalwell has taken so many
    different positions on so many topics he can't even remember
    them all.Just check out the local papers and the ebcitizen.
    Tavares even did more than one article on his flip-flops. He
    told people he was for the chained CPI, then he was against
    it. He told people he was for changes to Social Security, then
    he was against them. Not a good track record on consumer
    bills after he took corporate money either. Flip-flop, flip-flop,
    flip-flop. You are both losers!

    Like

  96. The Swalwell stooge is now pretending to be Corbett's ex. What a laugh. 2:39, 2:41, 4:46 are one and the same, although the troll did get the satisfaction of fooling one person. His style gives him away. LOL

    Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  97. Yeah sure! Corbett's ex! You mean the guy who bailed on a talented, ambitious future lawmaker when she wanted to be mayor? Great guy. I guess he was wrong since she spent the 20 years in public office.

    Like

  98. Ted Corbett here, Ellen's ex.

    I could tell you some stuff about her that would make you shiver. I'll definitely be supporting Eric in the race. Ellen and I are still friends, but she just doesn't have enough experience. She'll become a lobbyist.

    Like

  99. If you live in the district vote for whoever you want. I'll be voting for Ellen because Swalwell only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and himself. He's about everything that is wrong in politics. He's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting man will be a one term congressman.

    Like

  100. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  101. When is the Swalwell staffer lying?
    Answer—-Every e-mail he posts.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  102. Courtesy of the email post office: Return to sender–Space HO:

    Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  103. I just read Tavares's article and it definitely said Swalwell took significant contributions from the medical, defense, pharmaceutical and other special interests. This means we taxpayers get screwed again. I'm personally tired of paying 5 times what they pay in Canada for the same drugs, more than any other industrialized nation for my health care, and more than all the nations of the world put together for our military industrial corporations. Taking money from these a–holes is B.S. and leads to corruption of our government congressional representatives. I'm voting against Swalwell, and if our next Representative does the same, I'll vote against them too.

    Like

  104. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  105. To anon:9:05 and 11:52—After reading your comments I've concluded you're not looking for meaningful discussion. This is for you.

    Oh look, it's the Hayward anti-union, sexist, racist, pro-swalwell, extremist tea party troll trying to be meaningful outside his mental ward again. No one cares what you think–LMAO

    Like

  106. When is the Swalwell staffer lying?
    Answer—-Every e-mail they post.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  107. Courtesy of the email post office: Return to sender–Space HO:

    Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  108. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  109. To anon: 6:44—After reading your comments I've concluded you're not looking for meaningful discussion. This is for you.

    Oh look, it's the Hayward anti-union, sexist, racist, pro-swalwell, extremist tea party troll trying to be meaningful outside his mental ward again. No one cares what you think–LMAO

    Like

  110. When is the Swalwell staffer lying?
    Answer—-Every e-mail they post.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  111. Courtesy of the email post office: Return to sender–Space HO:

    Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  112. To anon: 11:17—After reading your comments I've concluded you're not looking for meaningful discussion. This is for you.

    Oh look, it's the Hayward anti-union, sexist, racist, pro-swalwell, extremist tea party troll trying to be meaningful outside his mental ward again. No one cares what you think–LMAO

    Like

  113. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  114. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  115. When is the Swalwell staffer lying?
    Answer—-Every e-mail they post.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  116. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  117. If you check the Citizen article “Swalwell Campaign Contributions” dated Oct. 16th you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  118. You are assuming I'm a Corbett staffer, which I'm not.
    I know you don't believe that because you are a Swalwell
    staffer. I am a supporter of Ellen though and live in the
    district. Keep up your racist and sexist talk because it will only
    help Ellen get elected. I can't help it if your candidate can't get
    anything done while my candidate is getting bills passed and
    signed on environmental, senior, children,women,consumer,
    privacy and education. It must gall you that your candidate
    flip-flops on issues so much he can't get any respect. LOL

    Like

  119. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    If I had a mistake prone boss like yours, I'd try and change the topic too!

    p.s. Calling people racist and sexist names is not winning votes for Swalwell. This is the 21st century.

    Like

  120. After reading these comments I've concluded if you're looking for meaningful discussion about the two candidates then you're not going to find them anywhere on this site.

    Like

  121. Hidy ho–return of the Space HO!

    If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  122. The Space HO is back from her BART ride.

    She was trying to tell folks that Whorbett is somebody other than a termed-out, big-money politician who will be going to Sac. town to whore for developers and big pharma.

    No can do, Space HO, you can't lie to us!

    Like

  123. Because of the tone of the Corbett staffer anon 3:46 et. al. (derogatory and sexist remarks), I will be voting for Eric Swalwell for re-election. I voted for Stark last time but realize that was a mistake. I think we need more honest folks in Congress and Eric is more than qualified. I'm not a gender ho. The best PERSON is whom I am supporting!

    Like

  124. You are assuming I'm a Corbett staffer, which I'm not.
    I know you don't believe that because you are a Swalwell
    staffer. I am a supporter of Ellen though and live in the
    district. Keep up your racist and sexist talk because it will only
    help Ellen get elected. I can't help it if your candidate can't get
    anything done while my candidate is getting bills passed and
    signed on environmental, senior, children,women,consumer,
    privacy and education. It must gall you that your candidate
    flip-flops on issues so much he can't get any respect. LOL

    Like

  125. The 2 posts8:41 and 8:42 were once again from a Swalwell staffer who
    constantly blogs pro-Swalwell comments on the citizen when
    his boss is criticized and makes sexist name calling a habit.
    Stop wasting our tax-payer money! I do live in the District and
    I doubt you do.

    Like

  126. My family will be voting for Ellen Corbett because we don't trust Eric to keep his word on anything. As this and other articles point out, he says one thing and does another. Stand for something will you. Mean what you say, and say what you mean Swalwell. What a wishy washy congressman! Also, quit taking money from big Pharma and shafting us little people.

    Like

  127. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  128. Last 2 posts were by a Swalwell staffer who consistently makes sexist comments.

    If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  129. Because of the tone of the Corbett staffer anon 3:46 et. al. (derogatory and sexist remarks), I will be voting for Eric Swalwell for re-election. I voted for Stark last time but realize that was a mistake. I think we need more honest folks in Congress and Eric is more than qualified. I'm not a gender ho. The best PERSON is whom I am supporting!

    Like

  130. If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  131. I know many of us voted for Swallwell against Stark, but will vote for Ellen because she has more experience and is a much nicer person than either of the above. She also doesn't flip flop on issues.

    Like

  132. Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop. Swalwell stands for nothing! Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop, Flip-Flop. Ellen Corbett in 2014. Even if I don't agree with everything she does. I voted for Eric, but he has been a major disappointment and doesn't deserve a second term.

    Like

  133. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  134. Agree. If you check the Citizen article “Swalwell Campaign Contributions” dated Oct. 16th you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  135. When is the Swalwell staffer lying?

    Answer—-Every e-mail they post!

    Just read the last 3 posts! LMAO

    Like

  136. Well what do you know? It's the Corbett HO, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one because there's only one). Remember the name Ellen “I'm a union-whore” Corbett if you want to vote for the developers drenched and pounded pussy or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Ellen has authored no significant legislation in Sacramento, I'll take Eric Swalwell who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  137. Because of the tone of the Corbett staffer anon 3:46 et. al. (derogatory and sexist remarks), I will be voting for Eric Swalwell for re-election. I voted for Stark last time but realize that was a mistake. I think we need more honest folks in Congress and Eric is more than qualified. I'm not a gender ho. The best PERSON is whom I am supporting!

    Like

  138. If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  139. Well what do you know? It's the Swalwell troll, stooge, shill, staffer (pick one cause there's only one). Remember the name Eric ” the corrupt flip-flopper” Swalwell if you want to vote for the developers wet dream or the mega-corporations best friend.

    Since Eric has authored no significant legislation in Washington, I'll take Ellen Corbett who has authored significant legislation to help the environment, women, consumers, seniors, children, education, etc.

    Like

  140. Anon 2:34 —-When is the Swalwell staffer lying?
    Answer—-Every e-mail they post. Just because you are a Swalwell staffer, don't think I am. I do live in the District and will vote for Corbett, not just because of this article by the Citizen, but because all the articles that show Swalwell to be corrupt and in the control of big corporations.

    Like

  141. Agree. If you check the Citizen article “Swalwell Campaign Contributions” dated Oct. 16th you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  142. I'm pretty sure Senator Corbett can't use her state money in a federal election. Does anyone know for sure? It would seem she is really behind in fundraising.

    Like

  143. The above post proves my point–thank you Swalwell staffer.
    I invite everyone to read the above article by Tavares and judge for themselves who has taken money from more special interests.

    Like

  144. If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Actually, you voted for Stark. Let's not lie. OK?

    Like

  145. Agree with 12:53, disagree with 8:50 and 11:44. There are Swalwell staffers that post on the Citizen quite often.

    When is the Swalwell staffer lying?
    Answer—-Every e-mail they post.

    Like

  146. If you check the Citizen article you will find Swalwell not Corbett has been bought and paid for by big business, large corporations, big pharma, etc. I'll take Corbett any day with her outstanding pro-consumer voting record. Go get him Ellen because you have a good chance of winning. Eric only won because people thought Stark was losing it. I also voted for Swalwell, but won't again. He's too inexperienced, corrupt and changes his mind on issues all the time.

    Like

  147. Dutra's still trying to beat Corbett … you all remember when Daddy Dutra tried to buy the state senate seat? He spent millions on fancy tv ads, signs that literally peppered the area, and hired a bunch of kids with no real allegiance to him or his policies. Well how did that turn out?

    Swalwell as a sitting Congressman will outraise Corbett. But hope he doesn't underestimate her. She has shown to be able to beat big money before.

    Like

  148. If you live in the district vote for whomever you want. I'll be voting for Eric because Corbett only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and herself. She's about everything that is wrong in politics. She's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting woman will be never be in congress.

    Like

  149. Because of the tone of the Swalwell supporter anon 6:14 (sexist remarks), I will be voting for Ellen Corbett if she runs. I voted for Eric against Stark but realize that was a mistake. I think we need more women in Congress and Ellen is more than qualified.

    Like

  150. My family will be voting for Ellen Corbett because we don't trust Eric to keep his word on anything. As this and other articles point out, he says one thing and does another. Stand for something will you. Mean what you say, and say what you mean Swalwell. What a wishy washy congressman! Also, quit taking money from big Pharma and shafting us little people.

    Like

  151. If you live in the district vote for whoever you want. I'll be voting for Ellen because Swalwell only cares about the rich, big business, big pharma and himself. He's about everything that is wrong in politics. He's been bought and paid for by the corporations and wall street. Disgusting man will be a one term congressman.

    Like

  152. Also, Ellen has $250k in her Senate account, which will help to level the playing field a little bit.

    Like

  153. In the 2012 election, Eric Swalwell repeatedly criticized Pete Stark for taking money from PACs and hammered home points about finance reform again and again.
    What a goddamn disgusting liar. He is everything that is wrong with politics.

    Like

  154. I agree. Obviously 5:09 is this Space Ho, who is a Corbett plant and would throw Swalwell a lead balloon if he were drowning. What a ho.

    Like

  155. My family will be voting for Ellen Corbett because we don't trust Eric to keep his word on anything. As this and other articles point out, he says one thing and does another. Stand for something will you. Mean what you say, and say what you mean Swalwell. What a wishy washy congressman! Also, quit taking money from big Pharma and shafting us little people.

    Like

  156. Common sense. Why throw away $$ on an old, term-limited gal who has nothing to offer and nowhere to go. She'll end up doing lobbying in Sacramento. That's her future. G-d forbid she actually practice law for a living!

    Like

  157. Since $161,000 of corbetts money was raised at the end of 2011 (before last election), doesn't that mean she has only raised$80K in “this election cycle”? Or does it not work that way?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s