Oakland Minimum Wage Ordinance Stalls, Boosting Chances of Ballot Initiative

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL | An Oakland ordinance that would have gradually increased the citywide minimum wage over the next three years failed Tuesday night while bolstering the likelihood a more liberal ballot measure hoping to raise it to $12.25 will succeed this November.

The ordinance, offered by Council President Pat Kernighan, was similar to a proposal put forth by the city’s business leaders. Supporters for the ballot measure to significantly bump the minimum wage from $9 to $12.25 starting in March 2015, said the ordinance was designed to undercut what is already a compromise down from $15 suggested by some earlier this year.

Kernighan, along with Councilmembers Lynette Gibson McElhaney and Larry Reid were the only votes in favor of the ordinance.

The defeat of Kernighan’s proposal makes it increasingly likely Oakland’s bid to raise its minimum wage at the ballot box will be successful. Recent polling shows the issue is very popular among Oakland voters. However, supporters of the ordinance said the city’s growing, but fragile economy will not be able to weather the increase over such a short period of time. Even if the ordinance had passed, it would have been superseded by the competing ballot measure, if passed by voters this fall.

Several council members noted the citizen campaign led by Lift Up Oakland caught the council and its business community flat-footed after successfully attracting over 33,000 signatures for its ballot petition. Councilmember Rebecca Kaplan noted the difference in the political landscape today as opposed to before the Lift Up Oakland campaign began. “A year ago, everyone would have enthusiastically supported this ordinance,” she said.

Councilmember Noel Gallo, whose opposition to the ordinance was a surprise Tuesday, added, “We all dropped the ball. It’s not the only issue and I’m sure it’s not the first time or the last time.” Unions and residents took the lead on this issue, said Gallo, and many of his colleagues, including himself, were early supporters of the ballot initiative.

Two other council members said Kernighan’s proposal was merely an attempt to obfuscate the merits of the minimum wage ballot measure. “I do believe that if we pass something tonight it will be use as tactic to the beat the citizen initiative,” said Councilmember Dan Kalb.

Councilmember Desley Brooks criticize the ordinance for undermining the $12.25 measure, in addition, to detractors who focused not on the plight of the working poor, but solely on business interests. “To think that it won’t confuse the voters is disingenuous, at best,” said Brooks. “If you were concerned with a minimum wage process, you would wait for the voters to speak in November.”

Although, Quan’s vote was not needed, she added to the discussion, saying she supports the ballot measure, but it still represents a yearly wage of only $25,000. “Not many of us want to live on this in this city,” said Quan. But, even she sees the political reality likely coming this November. “It’s pretty clear that people are going to pass it.”

4 thoughts on “Oakland Minimum Wage Ordinance Stalls, Boosting Chances of Ballot Initiative

  1. The minimum wage should be 15 dollars per hour with benefits and 20 dollars per hour without benefits.


  2. Every poll taken across the United States and all political parties shows 75-80% of Americans are in favor of raising the minimum wage.


  3. By MW:

    Of those so called “liberal” politicians, and not just in Oakland but all over the United States, who are supposedly in favor of drastically increasing the minimum wage, it would be interesting to see how much they themselves pay their own babysitters, governesses, gardeners, and other household help, etc,

    Most likely, most of them are nothing but Hillary Clinton style big windbags, chameleons, and demagogues who pretend to be interested in helping people of low and moderate income, but in reality are actually nothing but lying double talking parasites and blood sucking leeches totally determined to see how much they can rip off and grab for themselves, and while they simultaneously go through their charades of pretending to be on the side of the little people and the disenfranchised.


  4. “Supporters of the ordinance said the city's growing, but fragile economy will not be able to weather the increase over such a short period of time.”

    These are the same electeds who have done such a “wonderful” job building Oakland's economy in their, typically, decades in city hall. As with most of what they say (and do) they haven't the slightest notion of what's real. Studies show that minimum wage increases have minimal, if any, negative effects on local economies.

    “Several council members noted the citizen campaign led by Lift Up Oakland caught the council and its business community flat-footed.”

    These folks are caught flat-footed every day of their lives. Maybe Oakland citizens should think about electing some new folks.

    By the way I think the only mayoral candidate who is talking about bringing a specific number of new jobs to Oakland is Bryan Parker. He is talking 20K new jobs. That's the kind of number we need a new mayor to commit to. Not to mention accomplish.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s