![]() |
Alameda Community Developement Director
Debbie Potter at Tuesday’s council meeting.
|
ALAMEDA | RENTS | Alameda voters will have a chance this fall to decide whether to enact rent control on the Island. The Alameda County Registrar of Voters Office on Wednesday certified the renters-backed measure for the November ballot, setting the stage for a contentious fall campaign in Alameda between tenants and landlords.
“We’re thrilled,” said Alameda Renters’ Coalition spokesperson Catherine Pauling. “So many have worked so hard for this, but we have more work to do to actually get it passed.”
The Alameda City Council will next be asked to approve a resolution at its July 19 meeting to formally place the rent control measure on the ballot. That action is considered a formality.
Questions over whether the rent control measure would actually qualify were rising in recent days. Some within the renters’ group and Alameda City Hall were beginning to worry whether the number of signatures turned in by the renters’ group—7,882—was enough. The number of valid signatures needed is 6,461. In addition, concerns were heightened by the fact the registrar took a long time to certify the measure’s signatures.
At Tuesday night’s council meeting, Pauling showed some concern about the measure’s future, telling the councilmembers, “Failure is not an option. We will be back.”
In an interview Wednesday, Pauling said, “There’s always worry. I just didn’t know whether we would qualify, but I was more worried about the people who worked so hard to gather signatures, many who are seniors who did it to the detriment of their health.”
A second rent-related ballot measure in Alameda, this one backed by landlords seeking a charter amendment to ban rent control, turned in 7,491 signatures to county registrar on June 15. Whether or not it will be certified in time for the August 12 deadline for inclusion on the November ballot is unclear.
Certification of the landlords’ measure may not come until later this month. Further complicating the matter is the tight window available for the city council to formally approve the landlords’ measure. The July 19 council meeting is last scheduled before the annual August recess, observed by almost every East Bay council. [READ THE ENTIRE ARTICLE AT ALAMEDA MAGAZINE]
hollister
air max 90
ugg boots
coach outlet
tiffany and co jewelry
air jordan 13
hermes belt
coach outlet clearance
true religion jeans
michael kors outlet
vans shoes
michael kors wallet sale
uggs outlet
new balance outlet
michael kors outlet
michael kors outlet
michael kors factory outlet
louis vuitton neverfull sale
swarovski crystal
moncler coats
ray-ban sunglasses
moncler outlet
michael kors outlet
longchamp bag
pandora outlet
canada goose outlet
polo ralph lauren
lululemon outlet
michael kors outlet
beats by dre
rolex watches
cheap soccer jerseys
ugg uk
louis vuitton outlet store
longchamp handbags
ray ban sunglasses
tory burch outlet
0813jianxiang
LikeLike
ralph lauren
lebron 12
kobe 10
oakley outlet
true religion jeans
lebron james shoes 13
toms outlet
coach outlet online
coach outlet
pandora jewelry
fitflop sandals
louis vuitton purses
louboutin shoes
the north face jackets
louis vuitton handbags
tory burch flats
adidas outlet store
louis vuitton outlet
polo ralph lauren outlet
louis vuitton outlet
adidas superstar
cheap louis vuitton handbags
coach outlet canada
louis vuitton outlet stores
michael kors outlet clearance
ralph lauren outlet
michael kors
louis vuitton bags
ladies cartier watches
coach factory outlet online
coach outlet online
oakley sunglasses wholesale
copy watches
oakley sunglasses
adidas originals store
cheap oakley sunglasses
fitflop clearance
christian louboutin wedges
nfl jerseys
kobe shoes 11
20168.9chenjinyan
LikeLike
Sounds like 7,491 certain 'no' votes for the renters' measure.
Voters may well throw up their hands vote 'no' on all measures, with so many – affordable housing bond, utility tax, 2 or 3 potential rent control related measures…
ARC knows that confusion means “no” votes, which is why they are so desperate to keep the city from putting it's own ordinance on the ballot.
LikeLike