Swalwell proposes a total ban on assault weapons

15TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
East Bay Rep. Eric Swalwell wants to reinstitute the ban on assault weapons passed by Congress in 1994, but subsequently allowed to sunset 10 years later and replace it with a comprehensive ban and weapons buyback program.

While the previous law also prohibited the sale and production of new semi-automatic assault weapons, it still left millions of high-powered guns in existence. Swalwell hopes to go further, according to his opinion piece in USA Today. Swalwell previewed the proposal at a town hall last week in San Lorenzo.

“Instead, we should ban possession of military-style semiautomatic assault weapons, we should buy back such weapons from all who choose to abide by the law, and we should criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons. The ban would not apply to law enforcement agencies or shooting clubs,” he wrote.

The gun buyback strategy was famously used in Australia following the murder of 35 people in 1996 by a gunman using a semi-automatic weapon. This particular program cost Australian taxpayers $230 million in 1996, said Swalwell. “America won’t get off that cheaply. Gun ownership runs so deep that we don’t even know how many military-style semiautomatic rifles are in U.S. civilian hands.”

In the piece, Swalwell suggests the federal government could pay owners of semi-automatic weapons up to $1,000 per firearm in order to take the weapon out of circulation. Such a program could cost roughly $15 billion, he suggests. “No small sum,” said Swalwell, but just over one-third of one percent of all U.S. annual spending.



Categories: ban, bill, buyback program, CA15, congress, Eric Swalwell, Gun Control, guns, Opinion, USA Today

3 replies

  1. In short, you will take my AR “from my cold, dead hands!” Quoting Charlton Heston of the N.R.A.

    Everyone has a God given right to defend themselves, and most of the threat is from the Government. Just look at history. Governments killed +100 million in the last century. The founding fathers wanted the population of law-abiding, sane citizens well-armed, because they knew governments always, always become corrupt. This lesson was learned in the 1700’s except by current Democrats. Prior Democrats, like President Kennedy were N.R.A. members and well-understood this lessons of history.

    You’ll take my AR “from my cold, dead hands!”

    Like

  2. Meant: …President Kennedy were N.R.A. members and well-understood THE lessons of history. Excuse the typo.

    This issue makes me so angry. This is about how our whole society continues to exist in liberty, versus some snowflake, socialist utopia, that always ends in pain, suffering and war.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. Right-wing explodes after Swalwell suggests nukes would quickly end armed revolt by gun owners

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: