A partial rendering of the 240-unit Maple & Main
housing development approved by the Hayward
City Council Tuesday night.
Maple & Main, a 240-unit housing development in North Hayward, which city leaders hope will help kickstart improvement in the downtown and provide much-needed foot traffic, was approved late Tuesday night by the Hayward City Council.
The development also includes 48 units dedicated for affordable housing and 5,500-square feet of retail. A remodeling of the existing medical offices on the same site is also part of the project.
Hayward, like nearly everywhere in the Bay Area is facing a shortage of all types of housing. “We’re doing what regional planners say we should do and build urban density close to city centers,” said Hayward Mayor Barbara Halliday. Hayward Councilmember Mark Salinas called the project a “game changer for our downtown.”
The large number of affordable housing units slated for the project was lauded, in particular, by Hayward Councilmember Marvin Peixoto. Housing developers often choose to pay in-lieu fees to offset the lack of affordable housing in their projects. In the this case, the developer, Bay Area Property Developers, incorporated the 48 units, set aside for very low income residents, within the plan. “It kind of segregates the affordable housing from the mainstream and there’s significant psychological impact,” Peixoto said of past practices. “I think it will make the residents feel good.”
Rents for a three-bedroom affordable apartments will be $1,267; $1,097 for two bedrooms; and $914 for a one bedroom, according to Blake Peters, vice president of Bay Area Property Developers. Market-rate rents will be considerably higher with up to $3,450 for a three-bedroom apartment; $3,350 for two bedrooms; $2,450 for one bedroom; and $2,205 for a studio. Peters says the market-rate studio and one-bedroom units will be tailored for high-tech workers and young commuters. The Hayward BART station is roughly a half-mile away.
The Maple & Main development was approved by the planning commission in December, but some tweaks were needed before Tuesday’s final approval. One, being, the possible removal of a 70-foot memorial tree. The developer said the cost would by $75,000, but transplanting it to another location would be physically unfeasible and require removing power lines all along the way. Councilmember Francisco Zermeno, describing himself as a “tree hugger,” and other councilmembers urged to keep the large tree.
A deal was then tentatively made during the council meeting that requires the developer to make an attempt at moving the tree, which experts believe is of moderate health, but if it cannot, the $75,000 costs will transfer to street reconstruction on A and Main Streets. A city staff report says the cost of that construction is about $150,000. In addition, pending a successful transplant of the tree, the developer, instead, will pitch in $10,000 toward the street work.
The project is located near the beginning of the notorious Hayward Loop, which a few councilmembers offered concerns over its reputation for high speeds. Traffic bulbs are part of the traffic mediation plan for the area, said city staff. Typically, the alterations are advantageous for pedestrians since they decrease the distance traveled from one side of the street to other. But Salinas worried about the nexus of speeding cars and more families crossing the street. “The Loop traffic is fast and we got to do something,” he said.
A desire to move a majority of the project’s ground floor retail component from Main Street to Maple Court was also agreed Tuesday night. The council believes the foot traffic will be eventually heavier on Maple Court, thereby bringing more customers to the yet-unknown retailers.
Meanwhile, some Hayward residents continued a push for an Environmental Impact Report for the project. Residents from the nearby Prospect Hill neighborhood worried about impacts from increased traffic and loss of scenic views due to the development. But others, worried whether the Maple & Main site may eventually uncover Native American remains and artifacts. Hayward resident Frank Goulart displayed a newspaper clipping from 1959 that showed remains were found near the site. Native American remains, likely Ohlone, have been found previously following excavation in the downtown area. “Would you build over a Catholic cemetery?” Goulart told the council.
Councilmember Sara Lamnin did not discount the possibility that remains could be found later, but she believes protocols exist for its likelihood, including halting construction and alerting tribal leaders of the possible find. But she added, the site was paved over in 1960s without incident.”If it was never disturbed, the approach would be different,” said Lamnin, but she added. “The only way to know is to uncover it.”
City council meddles in HUSD business and they welcomed a Christian School so the rich people who are priced out of S.F., Silicon Valley and Oakland can live here and send their kids to private school. City council and their cronies made HUSD out to be a horror show, but they in turn wanted to keep their Frankenstein Data Dobbs. Good schools attract residents. We don't have good schools yet, but they are trying to bounce back after the Class Pac and Data Dobbs fiascos. Hayward can't attract businesses that will employ Hayward residents. Expect more town homes, apartment homes and condos. Holiday Bowl and Kaiser are two more locations waiting to be developed probably more housing. If Hayward becomes a sanctuary city, it stands to lose 11 million dollars. Not all of that money is for the schools. It also pays for homeless services and funds law enforcement positions. Should California become a sactuary state, then Hayward won't have to decide its status and Lunatic Elect Trump will cut off the funding, I assume.
If the current administration gets their way there will no longer be any public schools.
Affordability is defined by HUD. There are generally 3 different affordability levels – rent restricted to no more than 30% of household income that's 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) of the Oakland Metropolitan Area (low income); 50% of AMI (very low income); and 30% AMI (extremely low income). Data sets by year, region, and household size can be found at https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il.html.
It's also referred to as high – density low income housing. Later known as ghetto. The city council has their little hooks with investments with the developers for their own interests.
Is the city council figuring into this where the residents children will attend school and if existing schools in the area can handle addition students. They are building condensed housing in areas where single family homes existed and the schools were built to handle such.
so,what will the criteria be to qualified as low income? or affordable?