Endorsement Standstill in San Leandro

By Steven Tavares

The two main governing bodies in San Leandro can’t find a way to support each others ballot measures. After the San Leandro Board of Trustees tabled formally endorsing the city’s sales tax measure two weeks ago, the City Council, with seemingly ancillary discussion over its ability to endorse the school district’s sports facilities bond, returned the favor Monday night.

Despite comments from both sides offering personal support for each others measures, election politics and a cool relationship between the groups has denied any endorsement. All eyes now turn to the school board tonight as they again look at Measure Z.

Councilman Jim Prola said he believes the school board is willing to work with the council, although he said earlier in the meeting, former school trustee and mayoral candidate Stephen Cassidy had pulled sway with supporters on the school board to block support of the city’s initiative. Prola’s comments were later stricken from the record by City Attorney Jayne Williams. When asked if the school board will back Measure M at their meeting tonight after the city council failed to endorse their measure, Mayor Tony Santos said “Why should they?”

Numerous sources tell The Citizen Prola has sought out the school board’s support through a quid pro quo, but those talks may have been squashed by Councilwoman Joyce Starosciak who turned the agenda items regarding support of Measure M and opposition to Proposition 23 into a discussion of the council’s guidelines against making such endorsements.

Regarding Prop. 23 and latter Measure M, Starosciak said she understood there was policy against making such resolutions in support or opposition to matters outside of the council’s jurisdiction going back to 2004. City Manager Stephen Hollister says the policy was a guideline created in 2004, but never incorporated into the council’s handbook. Starosciak says she personally supports both items, but recommended the question be sent to the rules committee for clarification. The resolution in opposition of Prop. 23, the ballot measure hoping to overturn AB32, the state’s landmark environmental legislation, passed 5-0 with Councilmembers Bill Stephens and Diana Souza abstaining, but official support for Measure M failed 4-3 with Starosicak and Councilwoman Ursula Reed joining Stephen and Souza to block the council’s support. Both items will head to the rules committee as early as next week.

“I’m not going to be bound by a guideline by a council in 2004,” said Prola, who was the prime backer of the resolution against Prop. 23. “I won’t hide behind a guideline.” Prola, who was unusually animated said, “We have the obligation to take a position to protect our residents.” Mayor Tony Santos agreed and said the issue pertains to the city which he says has a high rate of asthmatics and has issued legislation within its borders to combat greenhouse gas emissions. Others disagreed with the council weighing-in on matter they says is outside of their purview. Stephens called it a “slippery slope” leading possibly to discussion of every issue imaginable. “Everything affects San Leandro,” said Stephens. “The war in Afghanistan effects San Leandro. We should consider were we go with this.”

UPDATE: A correction was made to the council vote for Prop. 23. Members Stephens and Souza did not vote against, but abstained.

Categories: Jayne Williams, Jim Prola, Joyce Starosciak, Measure M, Measure Z, Prop 23, school board, Stephen Hollister, Tony Santos

8 replies

  1. So Joyce is against taking a stand on anything but more than ready to take credit for other folks achievements. I get it!

    Also, someone tell Joyce we did not appreciate her art work over here.


  2. Joyce is a BAD choice for Mayor. I know why she does not support our school bond measure, because her kids attend private school.


  3. This sounds like one big circus. Did anybody ask some of these council people why they voted for one agenda items and not the other? It makes no sense and then it goes to a committee to do what? They already voted yes on one but not the other!


  4. Well maybe the nsupporters of each measure will at least ry to get out the vote against Whitman.


  5. Joyce was on the school board, and then put her kids in private school. If that's not a reflection on her opinion of her OWN leadership, I don't know what is. If she, God forbid, became Mayor, I predict she'd move out of town during or shortly after her one term.

    San Leandro's esteemed city leaders don't understand Federalism. They were not elected to voice their opinion on state issues, they were elected to lead the town; and they can't even do that right. I got an idea; how about balancing the city budget, hiring more cops and attracting business to town, and then work on solving all the state and Federal problems?

    Frank Lynn

    Frank Lynn


  6. Anyone connected with the San Leandro School Board should be highly suspect. Just look at the API scores…slightly better than Hayward, behind Oakland and Union City and Fremont.

    It is time to balance the budget, do not increase taxation and cap capricious spending. In short, oppose M and Z and cut as much as possible everywhere and hope that in fact the economy begins to return. Bill


  7. Our test scores at San Leandro Unified School District are below embarassing, if that is even possible and are just not remotely acceptable. San Francisco Unified was 70 points higher in their average test score and that is with a larger, more urban, and more diverse student base. The dismal schools here in SL and the seeming non-chalance about it are one of the reasons I am struggling with even voting for Cassidy as he was a part of the School Board regime too.


  8. Cassidy was a big problem for the school board, he convinced them to put a parcel tax on the ballot as a special election, costing the board $150,000 for a special election they lost. Also it is laughable that he is running as a fiscal conservative since he asked the city for several million dollars for the ninth grade campus.
    From what I hear, everyone other than Katz is happy he is not running for re election to the school board.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: