ALAMEDA: Mayor creates committee to study changes to City Charter

Alameda Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft has created a special subcommittee to study potential changes to its City Charter.

Ashcraft announced formation of the two-person subcommittee during remarks following her swearing-in as mayor Tuesday night.

Alameda Councilmembers John Knox White and Tony Daysog will serve on the subcommittee, Ashcraft announced.

The need for changes to Alameda’s City

Alameda Councilmember John Knox White

Charter was mentioned in a independent investigator’s report last spring on potential violations involving the former city manager’s allegations of council misconduct.

The report determined Councilmember Jim Oddie violated a provision in the charter that prohibits council interference with the city manager’s decision-making powers.

But it also found the same section Oddie was found to have violated was vague. The investigator recommended the city council amend the section to include clarity.

But a more comprehensive look at the entire charter is likely to also occur. During the last election, Knox White floated an interest in examining whether to increase woefully low council pay. Alameda councilmembers currently receive $50 a meeting, a pay scale believed to be unchanged since the 1920s.

Knox White also raised the possibility of moving from an elected mayor to a rotating system similar locally to Emeryville.

But the most controversial change, if proposed, includes switching the Alameda’s city auditor and city treasurer from an elected position to an appointment.

Current officeholders City Treasurer Kevin Kennedy and City Auditor Kevin Kearney, the “Two Kevin’s,” as they are known, have held the office for decades.

Their vocal and conservative views when it comes to city finances has long made them villains to Alameda progressives and labor unions, who often label the pair hypocrites for advocating budgetary restraint while they receive health benefits from the city for work that is anything but year-round.

Over the years these same groups have often raised the question of whether to strip Kennedy and Kearney’s power from them, a strategy that would likely be met with strong opposition from Alameda’s small, but boisterous moderate and conservative residents.

Pressure to act on the wish lists of Alameda progressives might be high, though. Last month a clear progressive supermajority on the council was elected to office.

And fresh off a dominant defeat of a landlord-backed charter amendment, renters are already clamoring for the new council to flex its progressive muscle and approve just cause renters protections.



Categories: Uncategorized

7 replies

  1. In order to stem corruption, City Council members should be elected by District, not At-Large; put that on the Agenda for Charter Amendments

    Like

    • gerrymandering, that’s why not.

      Like

      • If the Districts are set up evenly by population by a non-partisan Alameda commission so that the district reflects the neighborhoods of Alameda then what is wrong with that.

        Like

      • hey phillip, can you do us all a favor and stop vandalizing the community with bernie sanders tags. we know you’re doing it and you’re not anonymous. if you keep it up ill have you cited for vandalism. i have proof of you doing it and i will share it with APD. also you guys really need a life, you seem to care more about bernie than you do your own family. that’s pretty sad dude. try taking a break from the political shilling and just live life for a while

        Like

  2. is the special charter sub-committee just two people or will there be more?

    Like

  3. I think splitting the city council in to 5-9 districts, each with about 12,000 and 6,666 voters would be a good idea. The mayor would be selected for a 1 year term from the existing Council members to represent the City and run the Council Meetings. The 2015 estimate of the Alameda population is 78,630. 20.74% of the population is under the age of 18.

    Using the math from the census, the voting population of Alameda is about 60,000 folks. In the most recent election 54,886 more than 9 out of 10 Alamedans voted in the November 2018 City Council election.

    Last election had 54,886 voters for the City Council.
    Last election had 48,305 voters for the Governing Board for the schools.
    Last election had 33,063 voters for the recently passed Measure F.This added 0.5% to the sales tax giving Alameda a 9.75% sales tax with no expiration date.
    Last election had 32,736 voters for the recently defeated Meaure K. This allowed the Rent Control measure L to expire next year, December 31, 2019.
    Last election had 31,598 voters for mayor of Alameda.

    Like

Trackbacks

  1. An Alternative History of Measure A, Alameda's Multifamily Housing Ban – The Alameda Bee

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: